NEW YORK — In a four-page letter to Catholics in the diocese of Wheeling-Charleston, Archbishop William Lori further detailed the findings of his investigation into its former bishop, Michael Bransfield, raising concerns over both sexual misconduct and financial impropriety.
According to Lori, although his team did not find “conclusive misconduct with minors,” he said that it had “uncovered a consistent pattern of sexual innuendo, and overt suggestive comments and actions toward those over whom the former bishop exercised authority.”
Bransfield resigned in September 2018 one week before turning 75, the mandatory age when bishops are required to tender their resignation to the pope, after leading the diocese for 13 years.
On the day his resignation was accepted by Pope Francis, it was announced that Lori, who leads the archdiocese of Baltimore, was tapped to serve as apostolic administrator and conduct an investigation into Bransfield.
In his letter, released on Wednesday, Lori said that “I have sought to address the findings of the investigation and to continue to be pastorally present to the faithful of the Diocese as often as has been possible.”
“In the spirit of transparency and based on my many conversations during various visits to the Diocese these past months, it is clear to me that more must be said about the report’s findings and about the steps being taken to address them,” he wrote.
In March, Lori completed his review and submitted his report to the Vatican for review. This letter marks the first full public accounting of its findings.
Alongside questions of sexual misconduct, the letter cited a litany of concerns related to the diocese’s financial management, with Lori determining Bransfield engaged in “a pattern of excessive and inappropriate spending.”
“The investigation found that Bishop Bransfield initiated and completed extensive and expensive renovations to his private residences in both Wheeling and Charleston, as well as his intended retirement residence, the construction of which was halted at my request at the time of my appointment as Apostolic Administrator of the Diocese,” he wrote. “The investigation further found that Bishop Bransfield misused Church funds for personal benefit on such things as personal travel, dining, liquor, gifts and luxury items.”
“As we seek to understand how such behavior was able to occur over the course of Bishop Bransfield’s 13-year-long tenure, it is evident from those who spoke with investigators that the Bishop’s management style and personality undermined the effectiveness of diocesan policies, controls and oversight procedures,” he continued. “In some cases, it is apparent that the judgment of diocesan personnel was impacted by the culture of fear of retaliation and retribution that the former bishop fostered.”
Lori also said that in his capacity as apostolic administrator, he has decided to list for sale the residence of the bishop, which has served as the home of the last four bishops of the diocese.
Following the release of his letter, however, the Washington Post reported that among the items detailed in Lori’s report were financial gifts of over $350,000 to clergy members. The individual names, according to the Post report, were not included in the findings sent to the Vatican, and among the clerics listed in the report was Lori who had received a total of $10,500 from Bransfield over the years. Lori said on Wednesday that he had chosen not to list the names of individuals in the final report as he believed it to be a “distraction.”
Lori’s letter and the Post report comes one week before the U.S. Catholic bishops are set to meet in Baltimore for their bi-annual meeting, in which new guidelines for bishop accountability and conduct by bishops are set to be enacted.
“I am deeply pained by and sorry for the harm that the former bishop caused to those he was charged with shepherding in a spirit of Christ-like humility, service and pastoral care and charity,” Lori concluded his letter.
“There is no excuse, nor adequate explanation, that will satisfy the troubling question of how his behavior was allowed to continue for as long as it did without the accountability that we must require of those who have been entrusted with so much — both spiritual and material — as bishops and pastors,” he wrote.
This story has been updated to include additional findings from the Washington Post report.
Follow Christopher White on Twitter: @cwwhite212
Crux is dedicated to smart, wired and independent reporting on the Vatican and worldwide Catholic Church. That kind of reporting doesn’t come cheap, and we need your support. You can help Crux by giving a small amount monthly, or with a onetime gift. Please remember, Crux is a for-profit organization, so contributions are not tax-deductible.
