ANNAPOLIS, Maryland — A 23-23 tie vote in the Maryland Senate March 27 led to a defeat for a bill that would have legalized physician-assisted suicide.
“Because of your calls, emails and efforts, physician-assisted suicide will not be legalized in Maryland this year,” the Maryland Catholic Conference told the state’s Catholics in a message posted on its website March 28. The conference is the public policy arm of the state’s bishops.
“This wouldn’t have been possible without all of your voices and prayers,” it added. “Thank you for making a difference in the fight against physician-assisted suicide!”
The bill would have allowed doctors to prescribe lethal medication in pill form to patients diagnosed as terminally ill and deemed mentally capable. Patients would have received the prescription to take home and not have been required to take the pills in the presence of a medical professional or family member — or to take them at all.
Jennifer Briemann, the Catholic conference’s executive director, called the “End-of-Life Option Act” a “dangerously flawed bill.”
The legislation had been repeatedly introduced in recent years and blocked in committee. But it passed the committee level in February and went on to the Maryland House of Delegates, where it passed in a 74-66 vote March 7. The bill then moved on to the Senate.
Three days before the House vote, pro-lifers gathered with an increased urgency for the annual Maryland March for Life in Annapolis.
Immediately preceding the march, Baltimore Archbishop William E. Lori celebrated Mass at St. Mary’s Church in Annapolis and addressed the issue with the congregation, which packed the church beyond standing room.
“As citizens, we should be very alarmed by the possibility that physician-assisted suicide could become legal in our state,” the archbishop said in his homily. “The bill under consideration is regarded by many as a ‘Death With Dignity’ bill, but the death which this bill would allow for is anything but dignified.”
Lori said such a bill would “further undermine the dignity of human life.”
“In an already drug-ridden society, lethal pills are suddenly on the loose,” Lori said. “In the face of Maryland’s epic opioid crisis, this is not good public policy.”
That, he said, was just the beginning of the dangers: With rising health care costs, it might mean the government and insurance companies using physician-assisted suicide as a cost-effective alternative to life-saving measures or palliative care.
“This has already happened in states where physician-assisted suicide is legal,” Lori said, acknowledging those who support legalization would dispute that assertion. “In European countries where euthanasia has been legal for decades, it is no longer a question of a right to die, but it is now an obligation to die when one’s condition has become burdensome to the family or to the state-run medical system.”
At a February hearing on the bill while it was still under consideration by the House Health and Government Operations and Judiciary committees, a Catholic physician told Maryland lawmakers that “physician-assisted suicide fundamentally alters the physician’s role in society.”
In her testimony, Dr. Marie-Alberte Boursiquot discussed the duties physicians have to their patients: acting in the patient’s best interest; avoiding or minimizing harm; respecting a patient’s autonomy; and promoting fairness and social justice.
Medical professionals have to safeguard the relationship between a physician and a patient and protect the most vulnerable in society, including children, the sick, the elderly, the disabled, the poor and others, said Boursiquot, who has been a practicing physician in Maryland for more than 20 years and was president of the Catholic Medical Association from 2016 to 2017.
“Medicalizing death does not address the needs of dying patients and their families,” she said. “Physician-assisted suicide is not medical care. Physicians are committed to preserving life, not in taking lives.”