U.S. hierarchy stop short of mandating lay involvement in bishop accountability

U.S. hierarchy stop short of mandating lay involvement in bishop accountability

U.S. hierarchy stop short of mandating lay involvement in bishop accountability

Cardinal Daniel N. DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, looks on at the conclusion of the second day of the spring general assembly of the USCCB in Baltimore June 12, 2019. Looking on is Msgr. J. Brian Bransfield, general secretary. (Credit: CNS.)

After three days of intense debate over the role of the laity in overseeing bishops accused of abuse or its cover-up, the U.S. Catholic bishops voted to enact new standards for holding bishops accountable that include lay involvement, although stopping short of making it a mandatory requirement.

BALTIMORE — After three days of intense debate over the role of the laity in overseeing bishops accused of abuse or its cover-up, the U.S. Catholic bishops voted to enact new standards for holding bishops accountable that include lay involvement, although stopped short of making it a mandatory requirement.

While three major proposals were voted on Thursday, during the final day of their annual spring assembly, the most significant vote was to approve directives to enact Pope Francis’s new universal laws on bishop accountability on a local level. The document was approved by a vote of 218-1 with an emphasis on how the laity “should” be involved in the process.

Issued in May, Vos estis mux lundi  (“You are the light of the world”) is the product of last February’s Vatican summit on abuse where Francis pledged an “all-out war” on abuse. The new law – known as a motu proprio – makes it mandatory for all clerics and members of religious orders to report cases of clerical sexual abuse to Church authorities, including when committed by bishops or cardinals.

For cases in which a bishop is being accused of abuse or its cover-up, Vos estis relies on the metropolitan archbishop to conduct an investigation and allows for the involvement of lay experts in the process to ensure proper oversight and accountability.

At the start of this week’s meeting, it seemed uncertain to what extent lay experts could or would be utilized in that process.

RELATED: U.S. bishops face tough questions on new abuse investigation proposals

During the ensuing debates, the bishops sought to maximize lay involvement, as allowed for by Vos estis, while at the same time doing so in a way that was in accord with the universal law of the Church.

At the start of the meeting, numerous bishops, as well as the National Review Board (NRB) and the National Advisory Council (NAC), insisted that directives being voted on specify that the involvement of the laity in investigating must be made mandatory rather than as a recommendation.

Final language in the proposals dictate that “each metropolitan, in consultation with the suffragan bishops, should appoint on a stable basis, even by means of an ecclesiastical office, a qualified lay person to receive reports of conduct about bishops.”

The final language is the result of over 20 amendments that were proposed throughout the week — a process that was managed by the USCCB’s canonical affairs committee.

The directives go on to enumerate the responsibilities of the lay person, which would include: Interacting with the third-party entity which would receive reports against bishops; receiving reports himself; informing the public about how to report cases involving bishops; and taking part of the investigation itself.

As open debate over the document took place on Wednesday, Bishop Shawn McKnight took to the floor to make a final case for the compulsory inclusion of lay people in the process.

“Lay involvement should be mandatory to make darn sure that we bishops do not harm the Church in the way in which we have harmed the Church,” said McKnight.

“Who can deny that this is not the most important issue of our generation?” he asked.

Some bishops raised concerns that the process of investigating bishops could be slowed down in Rome, however Archbishop Jose Gomez, vice-president of USCCB, sought to reassure the bishops that this would not be case.

“The Holy See is aware of the urgency of these matters and are responding as fast as possible to the specific situations in the United States,” he said.

After the passage of the directives, Bishop Robert Deeley, chairman of USCCB’s canonical affairs committee, thanked the bishops for their patience during the process, adding that it had been “a long, difficult year for all of us.”

Following the vote, Bishop Michael Olson of Forth-Worth, Texas told Crux that he sees the vote as a response to both Pope Benedict XVI and Francis’s call for a “reciprocal responsibility of laity, bishops, and priests.”

“That reciprocal responsibility is ultimately to the truth and a clear path to obtaining the truth and living by it,” he said. “The goal is not uncharted for us as a church for the integrity of the gospel mission and the ministry of her ministry, but the means for getting to that is somewhat uncharted, and so we rely on the Holy Spirit and integral collaboration to get there.”

In a press conference on Wednesday, Cardinal Joseph Tobin of Newark also made the case that the new directives will rely heavily on experts outside of the Church.

“I’m confident that the idea of doing this in house is long gone,” he said.

McKnight also told Crux that he was “provisionally satisfied” with the outcome.

“These are three year protocols and directives. We will have another opportunity to look at this again and maybe at that time even go further than we have but for the moment, we’ve accomplished essentially in terms of practice what is mandatory lay involvement,” he said.

“All of the bishops just committed themselves to utilizing the laity whenever possible. What I take away from this is that the metropolitans of the United States have pledged that they will use laity even through the directives from the Holy See don’t absolutely require it.”

Vos estis enacts these new standards for accountability for a period of three years, after which time the Holy See will review the protocols, which are reflected in the newly approved USCCB directives.

In addition, the bishops voted to approve a new document, “Affirming our Episcopal Commitments,” seeking to recall the vows and obligations of bishops. The three-page document was approved by a vote of 217-1.

“Some bishops have failed in keeping to these promises by committing acts of sexual abuse or sexual misconduct themselves,” the document states. “Others have failed by not responding morally, pastorally, and effectively to allegations of abuse or misconduct perpetuated by other bishops, priests, and deacons. Because of these failures, the faithful are outraged, horrified, and discouraged.”

The document pledges “full support” to adherence to Vos estis and specifically addresses the way the Church has previously failed to understand the extent of the scandal of the abuse crisis.

“We understand ‘scandal’ not only in terms of how such allegations damage the image of the Church, but more so in how such sinful behavior injures the victim and causes others to lose faith in the Church,” the document states. “Our first response will be to provide for the pastoral care of the person who is making the allegation, as well as follow the established church and civil procedures to investigate.”

Finally, the bishops voted by a vote of 212 to 4 to approve a new a 9-page “protocol regarding available non-penal restrictions on bishops.”

The document outlines new accountability measures for emeriti bishops who have resigned or been removed from office due to “grave acts of commission or omission.”

In addition, the new protocol invests the diocesan bishop with the ability to restrict the bishop emeritus’s ministry within the local church and to make requests of the Holy See for a broader prohibition of his ministry. The document also notes that the USCCB president, in consultation with the Administrative Committee, can request for such bishops to no longer attend USCCB meetings.

Such a move could have broad implications for individuals such as Bishop Robert Finn, the retired bishop of Kansas City-Saint Joseph, who is the only U.S. bishop to be convicted of the crime of failure to report a priest suspected of abuse to civil authorities, yet nevertheless was in attendance at this week’s meetings and in the room during the vote.

On Wednesday, the bishops voted overwhelmingly to design a third party reporting system, which will function as a national hotline for reporting allegations against bishops.

RELATED: U.S. bishops vote to design hotline for reporting complaints against bishops

The vote on Wednesday provided approval for the USCCB’s executive committee to develop a more detailed reporting system before a full vote by the bishops later this year in November and will serve to meet the requirement in Vos estis that every bishops’ conference around the world must establish a “public, stable and easily accessible” system for submitting abuse claims by June 2020.

Following Thursday morning’s voting, the bishops entered into executive session for the afternoon. Their next meeting will take place in November of this year.

Follow Christopher White on Twitter: @cwwhite212 


Crux is dedicated to smart, wired and independent reporting on the Vatican and worldwide Catholic Church. That kind of reporting doesn’t come cheap, and we need your support. You can help Crux by giving a small amount monthly, or with a onetime gift. Please remember, Crux is a for-profit organization, so contributions are not tax-deductible.

Latest Stories

Most Read

Crux needs your monthly support

to keep delivering the best in smart, wired and independent Catholic news.

Latest Stories