DiMarzio 'ready, willing and able' to defend himself, as lawsuit faces delay

DiMarzio ‘ready, willing and able’ to defend himself, as lawsuit faces delay

DiMarzio ‘ready, willing and able’ to defend himself, as lawsuit faces delay

Bishop Nicholas A. DiMarzio of Brooklyn and other U.S. bishops from the state of New York walk through the Apostolic Palace after meeting Pope Francis at the Vatican Nov. 15, 2019. At left is Bishop Edward B. Scharfenberger of Albany. The bishops were making their "ad limina" visits to the Vatican to report on the status of their dioceses to the pope and Vatican officials. (Credit: CNS.)

Attorney Mitchell Garabedian says he still intends to file a lawsuit against Brooklyn Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio for clergy sex abuse.

NEW YORK — Despite claims that he intended to file a lawsuit with an allegation of child sex abuse against Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio of Brooklyn in December, attorney Mitchell Garabedian says he is still preparing his case.

When asked by The Tablet newspaper on Jan. 30 about the delay, Garabedian replied that he’s “just preparing” the lawsuit.

(DeSales Media Group of the Diocese of Brooklyn is a principal partner of Crux.)

Joseph Hayden, DiMarzio’s attorney, told The Tablet that the bishop is eager to clear his name, adding the allegation is from more than 45 years ago, which he believes raises credibility issues from the outset.

“We look forward to the filing of the lawsuit so Bishop DiMarzio can have his day in court,” said Hayden, an experienced trial attorney. “Bishop DiMarzio is ready, willing and able to defend this lawsuit as soon as the court will be able to hear the matter, because the allegation is not true.”

“We are very appreciative of the support we’ve received from the members of St. Nicholas Parish, many of whom will be potential witnesses,” he added.

The allegation against DiMarzio was first reported on Nov. 13 by the Associated Press.

In the report, Garabedian alleged that DiMarzio repeatedly abused an altar boy at St. Nicholas Parish in Jersey City, N.J., in the 1970s, and in a letter to the Archdiocese of Newark, N.J., he said he intended to file a lawsuit in December when New Jersey’s look-back window for cases that had passed the statute of limitations opened.

The alleged victim also claims he was abused by a second priest, the late Father Albert Mark.

Last October, DiMarzio was selected by Pope Francis to conduct an apostolic visitation to the Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y., to investigate allegations that Bishop Richard Malone mishandled sexual abuse cases.

Following a monthlong fact-finding mission, DiMarzio submitted a written report of his findings to the Vatican. News of Garabedian’s imminent lawsuit against DiMarzio broke following the completion of DiMarzio’s fact-finding mission, but before an outcome was announced. Malone resigned on Dec. 4.

Garabedian had previously described DiMarzio’s mission as “tainted” given the new allegation against him. Despite Malone’s departure from office, Garabedian told The Tablet that “given the fact that the chief investigator is a bishop that has been accused of child abuse is in and of itself tainting the process.”

Since reports of the potential lawsuit were first made, DiMarzio has categorically denied the allegation.

“In my nearly 50-year ministry as a priest, I have never engaged in unlawful or inappropriate behavior and I categorically deny this allegation,” DiMarzio said in November. “I am confident I will be fully vindicated.”

Last month, the Archdiocese of New York confirmed that under the new protocols for bishop accountability, Cardinal Timothy Dolan will formally conduct an investigation into an allegation against DiMarzio, which is standard process for any U.S. bishop facing an allegation of abuse.

In an interview last month on his radio show “Conversations with Cardinal Dolan,” the New York cardinal said his investigation is “expected” under the new Vatican guidelines Vos estis lux mundi, which were issued last May.

Under the new norms, Dolan, as the metropolitan archbishop of New York, is responsible for carrying out the investigation.

“I love the guy, he’s a good friend, he’s never had an accusation against him his whole life,” Dolan said of the case. “But in November, somebody made an accusation from way, way, way, way, back — 48 years or so ago — and, as much as Bishop DiMarzio said ‘This is preposterous, this is ridiculous, this is unjust,’ darn it, we have to take it seriously. We promised we would … and I have to as well, and the Holy See does.”

A source close to the matter has told The Tablet that former FBI director Louis Freeh has been hired to conduct the investigation. Freeh, who led the agency from 1993 to 2001, is the chairman of Freeh Group International Solutions, which conducts safety and security investigations around the globe.

Garabedian told The Tablet that he is still considering whether he will allow his client to provide testimony in the Vos estis investigation.

“It’s something I’m considering,” he said.

As the church investigation gets underway, and as DiMarzio awaits further action on the potential civil case, he has described his situation as “unfortunate” and one that is testing his patience.

Professor Mary Graw Leary at the Catholic University of America said that after allegations are made, there is often “not a lot” that an accused party can do until that person gets his or her day in court.

“Under the First Amendment, people can make accusations and the other party is left with denials,” Leary said.

Leary, who is a former federal prosecutor and the former director of the National Center for the Prosecution of Child Abuse, said that over the years, she has spent time with clergy members who have expressed fears that one baseless accusation could have personal and professional repercussions.

She said while that’s true, it’s important to offer perspective that such is the case with anyone accused of such things and that priests and bishops aren’t exempt from that reality.

In cases such as that of DiMarzio’s where no lawsuit has been brought, she said the accused party is often left with making broad or categorical denials.

For his part, DiMarzio described the recent months as “not a happy time,” telling Currents News that “it’s one of those unfortunate things that test your ability to stay calm under pressure and ability to keep functioning.”

Last month, he said he opted to cancel his longtime tradition of participating in Catholic Schools Week when several parents complained that he would be present at a school while unresolved allegations are still hanging over him.

“In order not to create a problem with the school … which would mar the whole celebration of Catholic Schools Week, I decided not to go,” he said.

Adriana Rodriguez, press secretary for the Diocese of Brooklyn, said that she believes it has been “disingenuous” for Garabedian to announce the lawsuit to the press without backing it up with a lawsuit to support his claims.

“Nearly three months later, nothing has changed and he is simply repeating his plan,” Rodriguez said. “Typically attorneys go to the media when a lawsuit is filed, not months before. It appears to have been a clear attempt to undermine the credibility of Bishop DiMarzio.”

“The bishop has hired an experienced trial attorney and is ready to go to trial as quickly as possible,” she added.

Rodriguez said that DiMarzio will be responsible for all legal expenses related to his civil defense and that the Diocese of Brooklyn will not be responsible for any of the costs.

Follow Christopher White on Twitter: @cwwhite212 


Crux is dedicated to smart, wired and independent reporting on the Vatican and worldwide Catholic Church. That kind of reporting doesn’t come cheap, and we need your support. You can help Crux by giving a small amount monthly, or with a onetime gift. Please remember, Crux is a for-profit organization, so contributions are not tax-deductible.

Latest Stories

Most Read

Crux needs your monthly support

to keep delivering the best in smart, wired and independent Catholic news.

Latest Stories